Sunday, June 28, 2009

Sarah Stickney Ellis on “The Women of England: Their Social Duties and Domestic Habits”

I find it interesting how this piece beings. Ellis starts this piece by stating “It is not to be presumed that women possess more power than men” (557) and yet goes on for the rest of the piece to show that all these women in leisure do posses the power over the men. But that this power should only be used in the domestic sphere. Ellis understands that women do really run the house. It echoes John Stuart Mill’s belief that women are only held in these positions due to social norms. For Ellis though this seems to be alright as long as women get to have the last say. In modern times it is often depicted that behind every strong man there is a stronger women. Here is a case that is showing it to be true. Here Ellis is showing how women may truly run the domestic sphere and not seem to lose their all important “Lady” status. The most important thing for women at this time was to hold this status. That ultimate status symbol for women was to be called a “Lady.” Ellis shows that this can be done without giving up any perceived notions that the word lady caries. Typically these high society women would be shown as lazily being thoughtful with as little effort exerted during the day as possible. Yet, for Ellis, there is a certain sense of power that can be derived from this stance. Ellis shows that women truly run the household and to an extent the rest of the world, though they cannot truly dictate everything. Ellis shows a dislike for war and wonders if men will ever stop and if they do would it be too late. Overall Ellis shows that being a Victorian lady was not of something to be degraded about but a mantle to be proud to bear.

4 comments:

  1. Robert,

    THis is a better post than your previous one--more in depth and more supported by at least one piece of textual evidence. Good commentary on Ellis, too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Robert,
    I thought your interpretation of Ellis’ The Women of England: Their Social Duties and Domestic Habits was very interesting. I wrote my blog on this work and read the other Alex’s and “lee”’s on the same piece. I think it’s interesting that us girls took her work as slightly degrading towards women. We acknowledged the fact that she looks at her role as something to be proud of, but overall we think she is supporting the idea that women only have a role in the domestic sphere. You gave a lot of credit to the women of the Victorian period with the bold statement, “women run the household and to an extent the rest of the world”. Interesting interpretation…I appreciated the insight.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Robert,
    It is only appropriate that I also comment on this blog, as Alex Q. and I read into this poem differently - which is quite interesting to me. The male perspective of this poem is quite intriguing... You seemed to find Ellis's writing as an outline for the underlying power women hold. Although I agree with this, I felt her ideas to place unfair boundaries on women, such that any power they may have had was being stifled by their 'duties' that were held to be quite absolute. I agree that Ellis is conveying that women should be proud of their roles, but I feel she is somewhat convincing them to be secure with their unjust inferiority. However, I really appreciate that you clearly present women as more important than this :)

    Thanks!
    Alex

    ReplyDelete
  4. Robert,
    We shared the same view on our analysis of Ellis"The Women of England: Their Social Duties and Domestic Habits". I also liked how you elaborate on the status of women to be a "Lady" at all times because of this being a social norm. In this period, being a part of society was very inportant.

    ReplyDelete