Thursday, June 25, 2009

Percy Bysshe Shelly “Ozymandias”

I have always been found of this poem after being required to memorize it when I was in eighth grade. It was not until during last week’s chat session that I came to realize that it was a warning to the King of England, George III. At the time of the poem it was at the end of George’s reign and with that in mind the poem makes incredible sense. As with Ozymandias, King George III, was at the height of his power, the most powerful man alive. Yet over time his reign could be only remembered by a couple of legs and a shattered image of his face. At the height of George’s rule he ruled over twenty percent of the world. Like Ramses II who ruled one of the most powerful empires of all time yet there is little to remember him by other than his claim of “look at my works ye mighty and despair.” But this claim is made in the middle of the desert. Nothing could be more analogous of this King’s current rule. In a few thousand years all the work that has been placed into this land would be all for nothing as nothing exist. The bitterness of Ramses could also come from the loss of some part of his empire of power. If the belief that the twelve tribes of Israel left Egypt during Ramses time then that would have been a clear black mark and left him with a “sneer of cold command.” George III oversaw the Thirteen Colonies become a nation that defeated him twice in forty years, the American Revolutionary War and the War of 1812. These left a black mark on his reign of England. There is a story that whenever the Romans built a arch celebrating a great general that while he was riding through the parade in his honor there would always be a slave whispering in his ear that his accomplishments could be all for nothing over time. Perhaps Shelly is subtly trying to tell George III the same thing.

5 comments:

  1. Robert,
    I liked how you connected "Ozymandias" to the rule of King George III. You draw some great parallels between his reign and the reign of Ramses II:they both controlled major portions of the world, and both rose to power only to fall. History remembers both, not for their power, but for their decline.

    I think you are right in asserting that Shelley is like the slave whispering in the Roman general's ear. The fact that the poem was composed after both American Revolution and the War of 1812 is significant. In fact, the swiftness of publication (written in 1817, published in 1818) shows the urgency of Shelley's message for the King.

    In any case, great insights! I really enjoyed reading you blog!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Robert,

    Very good post on Shelley's sonnet. I am glad to hear you had to memorize the poem, and that the effect of that assignment was to spark your interest in "Ozymandias." Good use of textual examples to support and illustrate your comments, and some good speculation in your movement from the poem to the culture in which Shelley wrote it. By the way, I think the target of the poem was also the Prince Regent, who went on to be George IV--he was apparently very vain about his legs!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Robert,
    I also had to memorize one of our readings in grade school. I memorized "The Charge of the Light Brigade." I really enjoyed how you heavily incorporated the historical significance of this poem. That was often a challenge for me when writing my blogs, and also when writing on "Ozymandias." You do a good job of comparing the two rulers, of past and present (in reference to the poet's time)in an effective and informative, yet concise way. Your quotes are also creatively embedded, which I liked.

    Good Job!
    -Alex

    ReplyDelete
  4. Like everyone else, I have nothing but praise for this entry. I'm a fan of history so I really did enjoy this post. Not only did you do the direct comparison of George III to Ramses, but you also compared the periods in which they lived, the power they possessed and, in only a passing manner, compared the exodus to the American revolution which if this were a history class would be an interesting conversation. Great post.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I definitely appreciated your background information for this piece. I also didn't originally think to consider that Shelley could be chastising or forewarning the King either, but it does make sense in hind sight, especially with Dr. Glance's comment that the Prince Regent was rather vain about his legs. I liked that Shelley wrote this with so much passion and power, it's virtually dripping off of the page. It's pretty cool that you memorized it, I bet it's great reciting it!

    ReplyDelete